A comparative study of fast-track versus [corrected] conventional surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion: Chinese experience

Sci Rep. 2014 Oct 29:4:6820. doi: 10.1038/srep06820.

Abstract

Fast-track surgery (FTS), which combines various techniques with evidence-based adjustments, is aimed to reduce postoperative morbidity, attenuate surgical stress response, thereby accelerating recovery and shorting length of stay. To further investigate the effectiveness of fast-track surgery, we compared the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion for Chinese bladder cancer patients with FTS or with CS in our hospital. Patients with bladder cancer were included and divided into two consecutive groups: CS group and FTS group. Duration to first flatus and regular diet, postoperative hospital days, hospital expense, incidence of complications and postoperative surgical stress response were compared. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, sex, BMI and postoperative TNM classification. Compared with the CS group, the FTS group had significantly shorter duration to first flatus, time to regular diet, postoperative hospital days and hospital expense, less complications, lower white blood count (WBC) and serum of C-reactive protein (CRP) on postoperative day 5 and 7. Our study indicates that FTS program is safe and efficacious for Chinese patients undergoing laparoscopic radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion. It can accelerate recovery, reduce stress action, shorten postoperative hospitals days and reduce hospital expenses.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • China
  • Cystectomy* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy* / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / pathology
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / surgery
  • Urinary Diversion* / methods