Speeding up all-against-all protein comparisons while maintaining sensitivity by considering subsequence-level homology

PeerJ. 2014 Oct 7:2:e607. doi: 10.7717/peerj.607. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Orthology inference and other sequence analyses across multiple genomes typically start by performing exhaustive pairwise sequence comparisons, a process referred to as "all-against-all". As this process scales quadratically in terms of the number of sequences analysed, this step can become a bottleneck, thus limiting the number of genomes that can be simultaneously analysed. Here, we explored ways of speeding-up the all-against-all step while maintaining its sensitivity. By exploiting the transitivity of homology and, crucially, ensuring that homology is defined in terms of consistent protein subsequences, our proof-of-concept resulted in a 4× speedup while recovering >99.6% of all homologs identified by the full all-against-all procedure on empirical sequences sets. In comparison, state-of-the-art k-mer approaches are orders of magnitude faster but only recover 3-14% of all homologous pairs. We also outline ideas to further improve the speed and recall of the new approach. An open source implementation is provided as part of the OMA standalone software at http://omabrowser.org/standalone.

Keywords: All-against-all; Homology; Orthology; Sequence alignment; Smith–Waterman.

Grants and funding

AMA is funded by a Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics Infrastructure Grant. IP is jointly funded by a UCL Impact Award and by Bayer CropScience. Open access publication charges are covered by the University College London Library. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.