Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum during cup insertion: posterior column stability is crucial

J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb;30(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

Abstract

Periprosthetic hip fractures around acetabular components are rare with little information available to guide surgical management of these complex injuries. A retrospective review of intraoperative isolated acetabular periprosthetic fractures from three tertiary surgical units was done. A total of 32 patients were identified with 9 initially missed. Acetabular components were stable (type 1) in 11 patients with no failures; unstable (type 2) in 12 patients and treated with supplemental fixation. Non-union and displacement were correlated with absent posterior column plating. Missed fractures (type 3) had the highest reoperation rate. Anterior patterns all healed, whereas fractures with posterior column instability had a 67% failure rate. Periprosthetic acetabular fracture can heal successfully with posterior column stability. Plating is mandatory for large posterior wall fragments to achieve osteointegration.

Keywords: acetabulum fractures; acetabulum revision; pelvic discontinuity; periprosthetic fractures; posterior column.

MeSH terms

  • Acetabulum / injuries
  • Acetabulum / surgery*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / adverse effects*
  • Bone Plates
  • Female
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal
  • Fractures, Bone / surgery*
  • Hip Prosthesis
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Periprosthetic Fractures / etiology
  • Periprosthetic Fractures / surgery*
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies