Density and stability of soil organic carbon beneath impervious surfaces in urban areas

PLoS One. 2014 Oct 9;9(10):e109380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109380. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Installation of impervious surfaces in urban areas has attracted increasing attention due to its potential hazard to urban ecosystems. Urban soils are suggested to have robust carbon (C) sequestration capacity; however, the C stocks and dynamics in the soils covered by impervious surfaces that dominate urban areas are still not well characterized. We compared soil organic C (SOC) densities and their stabilities under impervious surface, determined by a 28-d incubation experiment, with those in open areas in Yixing City, China. The SOC density (0-20 cm) under impervious surfaces was, on average, 68% lower than that in open areas. Furthermore, there was a significantly (P<0.05) positive correlation between the densities of SOC and total nitrogen (N) in the open soils, whereas the correlation was not apparent for the impervious-covered soils, suggesting that the artificial soil sealing in urban areas decoupled the cycle of C and N. Cumulative CO2-C evolved during the 28-d incubation was lower from the impervious-covered soils than from the open soils, and agreed well with a first-order decay model (Ct = C1+C0(1-e-kt)). The model results indicated that the SOC underlying capped surfaces had weaker decomposability and lower turnover rate. Our results confirm the unique character of urban SOC, especially that beneath impervious surface, and suggest that scientific and management views on regional SOC assessment may need to consider the role of urban carbon stocks.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Carbon / chemistry*
  • Carbon Sequestration
  • China
  • Cities
  • Ecosystem
  • Environmental Monitoring / methods
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Nitrogen / chemistry
  • Soil / chemistry*

Substances

  • Soil
  • Carbon
  • Nitrogen

Grants and funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41001047). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.