[Self-monitoring in inflammatory rheumatic diseases]

Z Rheumatol. 2014 Oct;73(8):706-13. doi: 10.1007/s00393-014-1413-0.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Background: Active involvement of patients in their care has led to better treatment and outcomes. Tight control concepts emphasize the need for regular assessments including patients' active involvement by self-monitoring.

Methods: The literature was screened with respect to published experiences of self-monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritides. The use of "patient-reported outcome" (PRO) instruments can facilitate self-monitoring. Potentially applicable PROs and their correlations to clinical parameters as well as modern data acquisition modes are presented.

Results: Some experiences for self-monitoring have been reported. Recommendations from national and international professional rheumatology societies do not yet consider self-monitoring; however, PROs might be used for self-monitoring but instructions for patients on "how to deal with self-monitored PRO values" are missing.

Conclusion: Self-monitoring of inflammatory rheumatic diseases seems feasible. Further evaluation studies are warranted to guarantee an optimized direct patient involvement in their management beyond outpatient care in hospitals and private practices so that they can thus contribute to a better outcome.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Arthritis / diagnosis*
  • Arthritis / therapy*
  • Diagnostic Self Evaluation*
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Humans
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care / methods*
  • Patient Participation / methods*
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Patient-Centered Care / methods
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Self Care / methods*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*