How a spatial arrangement of secondary structure elements is dispersed in the universe of protein folds

PLoS One. 2014 Sep 22;9(9):e107959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107959. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

It has been known that topologically different proteins of the same class sometimes share the same spatial arrangement of secondary structure elements (SSEs). However, the frequency by which topologically different structures share the same spatial arrangement of SSEs is unclear. It is important to estimate this frequency because it provides both a deeper understanding of the geometry of protein folds and a valuable suggestion for predicting protein structures with novel folds. Here we clarified the frequency with which protein folds share the same SSE packing arrangement with other folds, the types of spatial arrangement of SSEs that are frequently observed across different folds, and the diversity of protein folds that share the same spatial arrangement of SSEs with a given fold, using a protein structure alignment program MICAN, which we have been developing. By performing comprehensive structural comparison of SCOP fold representatives, we found that approximately 80% of protein folds share the same spatial arrangement of SSEs with other folds. We also observed that many protein pairs that share the same spatial arrangement of SSEs belong to the different classes, often with an opposing N- to C-terminal direction of the polypeptide chain. The most frequently observed spatial arrangement of SSEs was the 2-layer α/β packing arrangement and it was dispersed among as many as 27% of SCOP fold representatives. These results suggest that the same spatial arrangements of SSEs are adopted by a wide variety of different folds and that the spatial arrangement of SSEs is highly robust against the N- to C-terminal direction of the polypeptide chain.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Protein Folding*
  • Protein Structure, Secondary*
  • Proteins / chemistry*

Substances

  • Proteins

Grants and funding

S. M. and K. S. are supported by Grants in-Aid for JSPS Fellows. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (No. 23770174) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the “Tatematsu Foundation.” This work was also supported, in part, by the Platform for Drug Discovery, Informatics, and Structural Life Science from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.