The incidence of secondary vertebral fracture of vertebral augmentation techniques versus conservative treatment for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Acta Radiol. 2015 Aug;56(8):970-9. doi: 10.1177/0284185114544240. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) are minimally invasive and effective vertebral augmentation techniques for managing osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Recent meta-analyses have compared the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures between patients treated with vertebral augmentation techniques or conservative treatment; however, the inclusions were not thorough and rigorous enough, and the effects of each technique on the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures remain unclear.

Purpose: To perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies with more rigorous inclusion criteria on the effects of vertebral augmentation techniques and conservative treatment for OVCF on the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures.

Material and methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SpringerLink, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library database were searched for relevant original articles comparing the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures between vertebral augmentation techniques and conservative treatment for patients with OVCFs. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) were identified. The methodological qualities of the studies were evaluated, relevant data were extracted and recorded, and an appropriate meta-analysis was conducted.

Results: A total of 13 articles were included. The pooled results from included studies showed no statistically significant differences in the incidence of secondary vertebral fractures between patients treated with vertebral augmentation techniques and conservative treatment. Subgroup analysis comparing different study designs, durations of symptoms, follow-up times, races of patients, and techniques were conducted, and no significant differences in the incidence of secondary fractures were identified (P > 0.05). No obvious publication bias was detected by either Begg's test (P = 0.360 > 0.05) or Egger's test (P = 0.373 > 0.05).

Conclusion: Despite current thinking in the field that vertebral augmentation procedures may increase the incidence of secondary fractures, we found no differences in the incidence of secondary fractures between vertebral augmentation techniques and conservative treatment for patients with OVCFs.

Keywords: Vertebral augmentation technique; balloon kyphoplasty; cement leakage; percutaneous vertebroplasty; secondary vertebral fracture.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Analgesics / therapeutic use
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents / therapeutic use
  • Comorbidity
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Fractures, Compression / epidemiology
  • Fractures, Compression / therapy
  • Humans
  • Immobilization / statistics & numerical data
  • Incidence
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Osteoporotic Fractures / epidemiology*
  • Osteoporotic Fractures / therapy*
  • Pain / epidemiology
  • Pain / prevention & control*
  • Recurrence
  • Spinal Fractures / epidemiology*
  • Spinal Fractures / therapy*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vertebroplasty / statistics & numerical data*

Substances

  • Analgesics
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents