Ethical and legal implications of elective ventilation and organ transplantation: "medicalization" of dying versus medical mission

Biomed Res Int. 2014:2014:973758. doi: 10.1155/2014/973758. Epub 2014 Jul 14.

Abstract

A critical controversy surrounds the type of allowable interventions to be carried out in patients who are potential organ donors, in an attempt to improve organ perfusion and successful transplantation. The main goal is to transplant an organ in conditions as close as possible to its physiological live state. "Elective ventilation" (EV), that is, the use of ventilation for the sole purpose of retrieving the organs of patients close to death, is an option which offsets the shortage of organ donation. We have analyzed the legal context of the dying process of the organ donor and the feasibility of EV in the Italian context. There is no legal framework regulating the practice of EV, neither is any real information given to the general public. A public debate has yet to be initiated. In the Italian cultural and legislative scenario, we believe that, under some circumstances (i.e., the expressed wishes of the patient, even in the form of advance directives), the use of EV does not violate the principle of beneficence. We believe that the crux of the matter lies in the need to explore the real determination and will of the patient and his/her orientation towards the specific aim of organ donation.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Death
  • Humans
  • Medicalization / ethics
  • Medicalization / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Organ Transplantation* / ethics
  • Organ Transplantation* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Tissue and Organ Procurement* / ethics
  • Tissue and Organ Procurement* / legislation & jurisprudence