Components of task switching: a closer look at task switching and cue switching

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Sep:151:184-96. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jul 5.

Abstract

Research using the diffusion model to decompose task-switching effects has contributed to a better understanding of the processes underlying the observed effect in the explicit task cueing paradigm: Previous findings could be reconciled with multiple component models of task switching or with an account on compound-cue retrieval/repetition priming. In the present study, we used two cues for each task in order to decompose task-switch and cue-switch effects. Response time data support previous findings that comparable parts of the switching effect can be attributed to cue-switching and task-switching. A diffusion model analysis of the data confirmed that non-decision time is increased and drift rates are decreased in unpredicted task-switches. Importantly, it was shown that non-decision time was selectively increased in task-switching trials but not in cue-switching trials. Results of the present study specifically support the notion of additional processes in task-switches and can be reconciled with broader multiple component accounts.

Keywords: Cue switching; Diffusion model; Inertia; Reconfiguration; Repetition priming; Task switching.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Attention / physiology*
  • Cues*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Models, Psychological
  • Reaction Time / physiology*
  • Repetition Priming / physiology*
  • Young Adult