Evaluation of team lifting on work demands, workload and workers' evaluation: an observational field study

Appl Ergon. 2014 Nov;45(6):1597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess differences in work demands, energetic workload and workers' discomfort and physical effort in two regularly observable workdays in ironwork; one where loads up to 50kg were handled with two persons manually (T50) and one where loads up to 100kg were handled manually with four persons (T100). Differences between these typical workdays were assessed with an observational within-subject field study of 10 ironworkers. No significant differences were found for work demands, energetic workload or discomfort between T50 and T100 workdays. During team lifts, load mass exceeded 25kg per person in 57% (T50 workday) and 68% (T100 workday) of the lifts. Seven ironworkers rated team lifting with two persons as less physically demanding compared with lifting with four persons. When loads heavier than 25kg are lifted manually with a team, regulations of the maximum mass weight are frequently violated.

Statement of relevance: Loads heavier than 25kg are frequently lifted during concrete reinforcement work and should be lifted by a team of persons. However, the field study showed that loads above 25kg are most of the time not lifted with the appropriate number of workers. Therefore, loads heavier than 25kg should be lifted mechanically.

Keywords: Manual material handling; Team lifting; Work demands.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Accidents, Occupational / prevention & control
  • Adult
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Construction Industry
  • Cooperative Behavior
  • Energy Metabolism / physiology
  • Ergonomics*
  • Humans
  • Lifting*
  • Male
  • Pain Measurement
  • Physical Exertion / physiology
  • Task Performance and Analysis*
  • Workload*