General practitioners' beliefs about the clinical utility of complementary and alternative medicine

Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 May;16(3):246-53. doi: 10.1017/S146342361400022X. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

Abstract

Aim: To investigate GPs' beliefs about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and its role in clinical practice.

Background: Despite the prevalence of CAM in the United Kingdom, little is known about GPs beliefs regarding these alternative approaches to patient management and how they view it in relation to their clinical conduct and practice.

Method: A qualitative study conducted on 19 GPs recruited from the North West of England. Semi-structured telephone interviews were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes emerged from the data: limited evidence base, patient demand and concerns over regulation.

Conclusion: Despite recognising the limited evidence base of CAM, GPs continue to see a role for it within clinical practice. This is not necessarily led by patient demand that is highly related to affluence. However, GPs raised concerns over the regulation of CAM practitioners and CAM therapies.

Keywords: beliefs; complementary/alternative medicine; general practitioner; qualitative.

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Complementary Therapies / adverse effects
  • Complementary Therapies / standards*
  • England
  • Evidence-Based Practice / standards*
  • General Practitioners / psychology*
  • General Practitioners / standards
  • Health Services Needs and Demand
  • Herb-Drug Interactions
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Patient Harm / prevention & control*
  • Qualitative Research
  • Referral and Consultation / standards
  • Social Class