Shading as a control method for invasive European frogbit (Hydrocharis morsus-ranae L.)

PLoS One. 2014 Jun 2;9(6):e98488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098488. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Invasive European frogbit (Hydrocharis morsus-ranae L.) has negative environmental and economic impacts in North American water bodies. It is therefore important to develop effective management tools to control this invasive species. This study investigated shading as a control method for European frogbit in both greenhouse and lake mesocosm experiments. A series of shade treatments (0%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 100%) were tested in the greenhouse for three weeks. Results showed that the 100% shade was most effective at controlling European frogbit, and other shade treatments greater than 50% were less effective, reducing frogbit biomass up to 38.2%. There were no differences found in temperature between treatments, but dissolved oxygen decreased as shading increased. A lake mesocosm experiment utilizing 0% shade, 70% shade, and 100% shade treatments was performed in a sheltered inlet of Oneida Lake in New York State for over one month. Resulting European frogbit biomass was significantly (25 times) less in areas treated with the 70% shade and nearly zero with the 100% shade. Shading did not affect temperature but improved DO conditions. Results on the shading effects on submerged macrophytes were not conclusive: no significant differences in changes in species richness and abundance between the three groups at the end of studied period suggested no shading effects; significant differences between the beginning and end communities in the 70% shade and the 100% shade but not in the control group indicated significant impacts of shading. This study is the first one to investigate shading as a control method for European frogbit and it is concluded that a moderately high density shade can effective remove European frogbit likely with minor impacts on the environment. More experiments with larger scales and longer time periods are recommended for further investigation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biomass
  • Hydrocharitaceae / growth & development*
  • Light*
  • New York
  • Temperature

Grants and funding

This project was supported by the New York Great Lakes Protection Fund and the Vincent B. Coffin Grant and the A&S Dean's Research Fund at the University of Hartford. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.