Long-term risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack: a hospital-based validation of the ABCD² rule

BMC Res Notes. 2014 May 4:7:281. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-281.

Abstract

Background: The ABCD2 clinical prediction rule is a seven point summation of clinical factors independently predictive of stroke risk. The purpose of this cohort study is to validate the ABCD2 rule in a Bulgarian hospital up to three years after TIA.

Methods: All consecutive admissions to an emergency department with symptoms of a first TIA were included. Baseline data and clinical examinations including the ABCD2 scores were documented by neurologists. Discrimination and calibration performance was examined using ABCD2 cut-off scores of ≥3, ≥4 and ≥5 points, consistent with the international guidelines. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to examine calibration between the observed and expected outcomes as predicted by ABCD2 score within the logistic regression analysis.

Results: Eighty-nine patients were enrolled to the study with a mean age of 63 years (+/- 12 years). Fifty-nine percent (n = 53) of the study population was male. Seven strokes (7.8%) occurred within the first year and six further strokes within the three-year follow-up period. There was no incident of stroke within the first 90 days after TIA. The rule demonstrated good predictive (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.09-2.29) and discriminative performance (AUCROC = 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.86), as well as a moderate calibration performance at three years.

Conclusion: This validation of the ABCD2 rule in a Bulgarian hospital demonstrates that the rule has good predictive and discriminative performance at three years. The ABCD2 is quick to administer and may serve as a useful tool to assist clinicians in the long-term management of individuals with TIA.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Calibration
  • Demography
  • Female
  • Hospitals*
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Ischemic Attack, Transient / complications*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Factors
  • Stroke / etiology*
  • Time Factors