Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) following surgical myocardial revascularization is associated with high mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of acute kidney injury in a population of very old patients following different surgical techniques.
Patients and methods: A retrospective study of 310 consecutive patients aged 78 to 93 years, mean 80.5±2.2, who underwent surgery at one cardiac surgery centre. Based on the surgical technique used the patients were divided into: Group I. CABG (n=134) - surgical myocardial revascularization using extracorporeal circulation and arterial and venous grafts. Group II. OPCABG (n=55) - surgical revascularization without extracorporeal circulation but using arterial and venous grafts. Group III. NOTOUCH (n=121) - no handling with the ascending aorta was performed at all.
Results: A statistically insignificant renoprotective trend was found in patients who underwent surgery without extracorporeal circulation regardless of technique. Comparing groups II and III vs. group I, a significantly poorer renal functioning (median difference in creatinine was 10.0 (32.9) vs 17.5 (35.0), P=0.05) was shown for patients in group I.
Conclusion: Surgical myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation in very old patients is safe. The results of this study show a renoprotective trend.
Keywords: acute kidney injury; coronary artery bypass grafting; octogenarians.