Risks and benefits of connecting an implant and natural tooth

Implant Dent. 2014 Jun;23(3):253-7. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000101.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article was to review the current literature on the topic of tooth-implant supported fixed partial dentures (FPD) to determine risks and benefits for treatment planning considerations and weighing potential complications.

Materials and methods: A PubMed search (April-August 2013) was performed using the keywords "tooth-implant fixed partial denture" and "tooth-implant bridge" in addition to manual searches of bibliographies of full text articles and related reviews from the electronic search.

Results: A total of 21 relevant articles were selected for inclusion in the topic of tooth-implant supported FPD. Although risks such as intrusion of the natural tooth existed when using tooth-implant FPD, however, current evidence supports its clinical usage. Nonetheless, to prevent potential complications, careful planning and prosthetic design are essential.

Conclusion: Tooth-implant supported FPDs can have the similar success like conventional FPDs or implant-implant supported FPDs. However, careful planning and prosthetic reconstruction are required to ensure long-term success. Additional research is needed to gain a greater understanding of the biological and biomechanical factors affecting tooth-implant FPDs.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Dental Abutments / adverse effects
  • Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported* / adverse effects
  • Dental Restoration Failure
  • Denture, Partial, Fixed* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Risk Assessment