Evaluation of routine biopsies in endoscopic screening for esophagogastric junction cancer

World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 7;20(17):5074-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5074.

Abstract

Aim: To explore whether routine biopsies at the high incidence spot of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer are justified in endoscopic screening.

Methods: This was a multicenter population-based study conducted in eight high-risk areas in China. A total of 37396 participants underwent endoscopic examination. Biopsies were obtained from visible mucosal abnormalities or from normal-appearing mucosa at the high incidence spot of esophagogastric junction cancer when no abnormality was detected. Specimens showing high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HIN) or higher grade lesions were deemed as pathologically "positive". The ratios of positive pathologic diagnosis between participants with abnormal and normal-appearing mucosa were compared using the Pearson χ(2) test. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, adjusted for potential confounders, were calculated using logistic regression.

Results: A total of 37520 individuals participated in this study and 37396 (99.7%) participants had full information and were suitable for analysis. During endoscopic examinations, 9.11% (3405/37396) participants were found to have visible mucosal lesions. Of the participants who had normal-appearing mucosa at the EGJ, only 0.28% (94/33991) were diagnosed with HIN or higher grade lesions, whereas 6.05% (206/3405) of participants with abnormalities at the EGJ had a positive pathologic result. After controlling for other variables, visible abnormal mucosa detected under endoscopy strongly predicted a positive pathologic result (OR = 32.51, 95%CI: 23.96-44.09). The proportion of participants with "positive" pathologic diagnoses increased as the total number of endoscopic examinations performed by the doctors increased (< 5000 cases vs 5000-10000 cases vs > 10000 cases, Z = -2.7207, P = 0.0065, Cochran Armiger trend test). The same trend was found between the proportion of participants with positive pathologic diagnoses and the total number of years the doctors performed endoscopy (< 5 years vs 5-10 years vs > 10 years, Z = -10.3222, P < 0.001, Cochran Armiger trend test).

Conclusion: Additional routine biopsies from the high incidence spot of EGJ cancer are of limited value and are unjustified.

Keywords: Biopsy; Endoscopy; Esophagogastric junction cancer; High incidence spot; Screening.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Biopsy*
  • Carcinoma in Situ / epidemiology
  • Carcinoma in Situ / pathology*
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • China / epidemiology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Endoscopy, Digestive System*
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Esophagogastric Junction / pathology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mucous Membrane / pathology
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Neoplasm Grading
  • Odds Ratio
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Stomach Neoplasms / epidemiology
  • Stomach Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Unnecessary Procedures