Purpose: The aim of this case-control study was to evaluate the postoperative period and healing between 2 surgical methods (traditional and ultrasound bone surgery) that are used for mandibular third-molar extraction.
Patients and methods: Fifteen patients with impaction of both of the lower third molars and indications for their extractions were used in this study. Bilateral-mandibular third-molar extractions were performed at the same surgical time: traditional surgery with burrs was used on 1 side (control site), and ultrasound surgery was used on the other side (test [T] site). After surgery, the patients were examined at 7 and 14 days and at 1 and 3 months to evaluate tissue healing. The following was assessed at every follow-up: pain, trismus, swelling, and alveolar bone level.
Results: The study included 15 patients, and 30 mandibular third-molar extractions were performed. We found only 1 postoperative complication: 1 patient had alveolitis in the control site. Complete recoveries without any complications were reported in all of the patients at the T sites.
Conclusions: Complete recoveries without any complication were reported in all patients at the T sites. The only disadvantage of the piezoelectric technique was the length of operation time, which was increased by approximately 8 minutes; however, this effect was offset by reducing the morbidity.
Clinical relevance: Our preliminary study showed that Piezosurgery is an excellent tool for reducing the risk of complications and improving the postoperative period.