Ergonomic design of a computer mouse for clients with wrist splints

Am J Occup Ther. 2014 May-Jun;68(3):317-24. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2014.009928.

Abstract

Objective: We explored effects of cutaneous feedback and hump position on efficiency and comfort in mouse use with a splint. We also analyzed the relationship between anthropometric measurements (width of hand and length of hand, palm, and index) and the task performance.

Method: Thirty participants performed a computer task with two forms of mice (front hump and rear hump) and two kinds of wrist splints (dorsal and volar). Movement time and satisfaction scores were recorded.

Results: No interaction effect (Hump Position × Splint Type) was found on movement time. Movement time was shorter for rear-hump mouse users than for front-hump mouse users. Movement time was also shorter for wearers of dorsal wrist splints than for wearers of volar wrist splints. Limited differences existed in the satisfaction scores. Participants with a longer index finger had shorter movement time.

Conclusion: Both dorsal wrist splints and rear-hump mice are recommended. Length of index finger positively correlated with task performance.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Anthropometry
  • Computer Peripherals*
  • Equipment Design
  • Ergonomics*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Splints*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Wrist Injuries / rehabilitation*
  • Young Adult