Objectives: To evaluate renorrhaphy techniques and to analyze surgical outcomes in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
Methods: A retrospective study from January 2008 to December 2011 analyzed 526 patients with renal tumors in whom renorrhaphy was changed from one layer, interrupted, figure-of-eight (n = 228) suture to two layers, continuous, unknotted (n = 298) suture. All procedures were carried out by the same laparoscopic surgeon (XZ). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, operative outcomes and perioperative renal function were compared.
Results: Median follow up for one layer, interrupted, figure-of-eight suture and two layers, continuous, unknotted suture was 31 and 28 months, respectively. The two layers, continuous, unknotted suture group had shorter warm ischemia time (P = 0.021), faster removal of Jackson-Pratt drains (P = 0.029) and shorter hospital stay (P = 0.037) than the one layer, interrupted, figure-of-eight suture group. There was a trend towards a better preservation of glomerular filtration rates in the two layers, continuous, unknotted suture group (P = 0.045). In a multivariable model, the two layers, continuous, unknotted suture technique was a statistically significant independent predictor of warm ischemia time (P = 0.01), hospital stay (P = 0.001) and estimated glomerular filtration rates (P = 0.043).
Conclusions: Two layers, continuous, unknotted suture renorrhaphy allows better outcomes than one layer, interrupted, figure-of-eight suture renorrhaphy in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. A longer clinical follow-up evaluation is warranted.
Keywords: outcomes; partial nephrectomy; renal tumors; renorrhaphy; retroperitoneal laparoscopy.
© 2014 The Japanese Urological Association.