Nowadays the choice to start with a renal replacement therapy (or its withdrawal once begun) is a critical issue leading to review the paradigm of constantly treating terminal uremia by means of dialysis technologies, without caring for effective prognosis nor for patients preferences, in a more affordable physician-patient relationship. Furthermore dialysis patients mean age is increasing and such population bears the burden of comorbidities that seriously affect survival and quality of life. In any case, dialysis withdrawing does not mean neglecting the patient: the start, or continuation of a very low protein diet program may represent a reasonable alternative, not only for uremic symptoms control but also providing a slowing of disease progression (at least postponing further the start of renal replacement therapy). Basically, in our opinion, the decision to start dialysis in an eligible patient, mainly in the elderly or frails, it should be driven by an adequate balance among all the factors. These factors play a role not only concerning survival, but also in life quality issues and patients preferences. Thus, we argue that ethical issues must be taken into account as well as compelling clinical factors which usually nephrologists refer to. To pursue this goal, it could be useful to set up specific educational pathways addressed to physicians, nurses and technicians of renal units. It also could be instrumental in developing new strategies to manage end stage renal failure, considering not only hospital facilities,but also nursing and patients homes. Incoming guidelines could help nephrologists in improving their behaviors to face these new issues.