Aims: To evaluate the effects of access route upon clinical results and quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing either transfemoral (TF-TAVI) or transapical balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI) in the real world.
Methods and results: A prospective analysis was performed upon 264 consecutive patients receiving TF-TAVI or TA-TAVI. QoL was assessed using the EQ-5D questionnaire. At baseline, TA-TAVI patients reported significantly more problems in mobility, self-care, usual activities and lower overall health status domains (p<0.01 for all). At 30 days, the TF-TAVI group reported fewer problems with usual activity (p=0.01) and pain/discomfort (p<0.01), and higher EQ-5D index and visual analogue scale (VAS) (p=0.01 and p<0.01, respectively) than the TA-TAVI group. Nevertheless, the absolute improvements (ΔEQ-5D index and ΔEQ-5D VAS) were larger in the TA-TAVI group, with most dramatically marked QoL absolute improvements (p<0.01 and p=0.02, respectively). By one year, notwithstanding higher all-cause mortality in the sicker TA-TAVI group, there were no differences between groups in any EQ-5D domain. Indeed, surviving TA-TAVI group's greater absolute improvements remained (p<0.01).
Conclusions: QoL is greater at the earlier time point of 30 days in the TF-TAVI cohort but equatable by one year. However, the magnitude of improvement in QoL is greater in the TA-TAVI patients at both 30 days and one year.