Microhardness of light- and dual-polymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns

J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):942-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Apr 22.

Abstract

Statement of the problem: The complete polymerization of luting resins through thick indirect restorations is still questioned.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of polymerization of light- and dual-polymerizable luting resins under thick indirect composite resin and ceramic endocrowns by means of Vickers microhardness measurements.

Material and methods: The Vickers microhardness measurements of a light-polymerizable microhybrid composite resin and a dual-polymerizable luting cement directly polymerized in a natural tooth mold for 40 seconds with a high-power light-emitting diode lamp (control) were compared with measurements after indirect irradiation through 7.5-mm-thick composite resin and ceramic endocrowns for 3 × 90 seconds. A test-to-control microhardness values ratio of 0.80 at a depth of 0.5 mm below the surface was assumed as the criterion for adequate conversion.

Results: For the Vickers microhardness measurements of a dual-polymerizable luting cement, no differences (P>.05) were found between Vickers microhardness control values and values reported after polymerization through composite resin and ceramic endocrowns. For The Vickers microhardness measurements (±SD) of a light-polymerizable microhybrid composite resin, control values were significantly (P<.05) higher (111 ±3.3) than those reported after polymerization through composite resin (100.5 ±3.8) and ceramic (99.7 ±2.3) endocrowns. However, the hardness values of The Vickers microhardness measurements of a light-polymerizable microhybrid composite resin polymerized through the endocrowns were approximately 10% to 12% lower than those of the control values. Two-way ANOVA showed the influence of the luting material on the Vickers microhardness values (P<.05). The effect of endocrown material was not significant (P>.05).

Conclusions: Under the conditions of this in vitro study, Vickers microhardness values of the dual-polymerizable resin cement and the light-polymerizable restorative composite resin irradiated for 3 × 90 seconds with a high irradiance light-emitting diode lamp through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns reached at least 80% of the control Vickers microhardness values, which means that both materials can be adequately polymerized when they are used for luting thick indirect restorations.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aluminum Silicates / chemistry
  • Ceramics / chemistry
  • Composite Resins / chemistry
  • Crowns*
  • Curing Lights, Dental / classification
  • Dental Materials / chemistry
  • Dental Porcelain / chemistry
  • Dental Stress Analysis / instrumentation
  • Hardness
  • Humans
  • Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives / instrumentation
  • Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives / methods*
  • Materials Testing
  • Polymerization
  • Potassium Compounds / chemistry
  • Resin Cements / chemistry*
  • Self-Curing of Dental Resins / instrumentation
  • Self-Curing of Dental Resins / methods*
  • Spectrophotometry / methods
  • Surface Properties
  • Tooth, Nonvital / therapy
  • Zirconium / chemistry

Substances

  • Aluminum Silicates
  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Materials
  • Potassium Compounds
  • Resin Cements
  • Tetric
  • Vita Mark II
  • paradigm MZ100
  • Dental Porcelain
  • feldspar
  • Variolink
  • Zirconium