Evaluation of a large-scale donation of Lifebox pulse oximeters to non-physician anaesthetists in Uganda

Anaesthesia. 2014 May;69(5):445-51. doi: 10.1111/anae.12632.

Abstract

Pulse oximetry is widely accepted as essential monitoring for safe anaesthesia, yet is frequently unavailable in resource-limited settings. The Lifebox pulse oximeter, and associated management training programme, was delivered to 79 non-physician anaesthetists attending the 2011 Uganda Society of Anaesthesia Annual Conference. Using a standardised assessment, recipients were tested for their knowledge of oximetry use and hypoxia management before, immediately following and 3-5 months after the training. Before the course, the median (IQR [range]) test score for the anaesthetists was 36 (34-39 [26-44]) out of a maximum of 50 points. Immediately following the course, the test score increased to 41 (38-43 [25-47]); p < 0.0001 and at the follow-up visit at 3-5 months it was 41 (39-44 [33-49]); p = 0.001 compared with immediate post-training test scores, and 75/79 (95%) oximeters were in routine clinical use. This method of introduction resulted in a high rate of uptake of oximeters into clinical practice and a demonstrable retention of knowledge in a resource-limited setting.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anesthesiology*
  • Clinical Competence / statistics & numerical data*
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Hypoxia / diagnosis*
  • Inservice Training / methods*
  • Inservice Training / statistics & numerical data
  • Monitoring, Intraoperative / instrumentation*
  • Monitoring, Intraoperative / methods
  • Oximetry / instrumentation*
  • Uganda