Development and applications of a comprehensive land use classification and map for the US

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 11;9(4):e94628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094628. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Land cover maps reasonably depict areas that are strongly converted by human activities, but typically are unable to resolve low-density but widespread development patterns. Data products specifically designed to resolve land uses complement land cover datasets and likely improve our ability to understand the extent and complexity of human modification. Methods for developing a comprehensive land use classification system are described, and a map of land use for the conterminous United States is presented to reveal what we are doing on the land. The comprehensive, detailed and high-resolution dataset was developed through spatial analysis of nearly two-dozen publicly-available, national spatial datasets--predominantly based on census housing, employment, and infrastructure, as well as land cover from satellite imagery. This effort resulted in 79 land use classes that fit within five main land use groups: built-up, production, recreation, conservation, and water. Key findings from this study are that built-up areas occupy 13.6% of mainland US, but that the majority of this occurs as low-density exurban/rural residential (9.1% of the US), while more intensive built-up land uses occupy 4.5%. For every acre of urban and suburban residential land, there are 0.13 commercial, 0.07 industrial, 0.48 institutional, and 0.29 acres of interstates/highways. This database can be used to address a variety of natural resource applications, and I provide three examples here: an entropy index of the diversity of land uses for smart-growth planning, a power-law scaling of metropolitan area population to developed footprint, and identifying potential conflict areas by delineating the urban interface.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Agriculture*
  • Conservation of Natural Resources*
  • Datasets as Topic
  • Geographic Mapping*
  • Humans
  • Maps as Topic
  • United States

Grants and funding

This work was partially funded by the NASA Applied Sciences Program (10-BIOCLIM10-0034), the US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Center, and the US EPA National Center for Environmental Assessment. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.