The effects of perceived mating opportunities on patterns of reproductive investment by male guppies

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 4;9(4):e93780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093780. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Males pay considerable reproductive costs in acquiring mates (precopulatory sexual selection) and in producing ejaculates that are effective at fertilising eggs in the presence of competing ejaculates (postcopulatory sexual selection). Given these costs, males must balance their reproductive investment in a given mating to optimise their future reproductive potential. Males are therefore expected to invest in reproduction prudently according to the likelihood of obtaining future matings. In this study we tested this prediction by determining whether male reproductive investment varies with expected future mating opportunities, which were experimentally manipulated by visually exposing male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) to high or low numbers of females in the absence of competing males. Our experiment did not reveal consistent effects of perceived future mating opportunity on either precopulatory (male mate choice and mating behaviour) or postcopulatory (sperm quality and quantity) investment. However, we did find that male size and female availability interacted to influence mating behaviour; large males visually deprived of females during the treatment phase became more choosy and showed greater interest in their preferred female than those given continuous visual access to females. Overall, our results suggest males tailor pre- rather than postcopulatory traits according to local female availability, but critically, these effects depend on male size.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Body Size / physiology
  • Choice Behavior / physiology
  • Competitive Behavior / physiology
  • Linear Models
  • Male
  • Mating Preference, Animal / physiology*
  • Poecilia / physiology*
  • Reproduction / physiology*
  • Spermatozoa / physiology

Grants and funding

This research was funded by a student grant to L.T.B. from the School of Animal Biology at the University of Western Australia, a Marie Curie International Outgoing Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme (grant no. 272613) to C.G., and a Discovery Grant from the Australian Research Council to J.P.E. (grant no. DP120100773). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.