A moving target: Image guidance for stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Michael N Corradetti; Nandita Mitra; Lara P Bonner Millar; John Byun; Fei Wan; Smith Apisarnthanarax; John Christodouleas; Nathan Anderson; Charles B Simone 2nd; Boon-Keng Teo; Ramesh Rengan

doi:10.1016/j.prro.2012.10.005

A moving target: Image guidance for stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013 Oct-Dec;3(4):307-15. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

Affiliations

¹ Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: corradetti@uphs.upenn.edu.
² Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
³ Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

PMID: 24674403
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2012.10.005

Abstract

Purpose: Precise patient positioning is critical due to the large fractional doses and small treatment margins employed for thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The goals of this study were to evaluate the following: (1) the accuracy of kilovoltage x-ray (kV x-ray) matching to bony anatomy for pretreatment positioning; (2) the magnitude of intrafraction tumor motion; and (3) whether treatment or patient characteristics correlate with intrafraction motion.

Methods and materials: Eighty-seven patients with lung cancer were treated with SBRT. Patients were positioned with orthogonal kV x-rays matched to bony anatomy followed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), with matching of the CBCT-visualized tumor to the internal gross target volume obtained from a 4-dimensional CT simulation data set. Patients underwent a posttreatment CBCT to assess the magnitude of intrafraction motion.

Results: The mean CBCT-based shifts after initial patient positioning using kV x-rays were 2.2 mm in the vertical axis, 1.8 mm in the longitudinal axis, and 1.6 mm in the lateral axis (n = 335). The percentage of shifts greater than 3 mm and 5 mm represented 39% and 17%, respectively, of all fractions delivered. The mean CBCT-based shifts after treatment were 1.6 mm vertically, 1.5 mm longitudinally, and 1.1 mm laterally (n = 343). Twenty-seven percent and 10% of shifts were greater than 3 mm and 5 mm, respectively. Univariate and multivariable analysis demonstrated a significant association between intrafraction motion with weight and pulmonary function.

Conclusions: Kilovoltage x-ray matching to bony anatomy is inadequate for accurate positioning when a conventional 3-5 mm margin is employed prior to lung SBRT. Given the treatment techniques used in this study, CBCT image guidance with a 5-mm planning target volume margin is recommended. Further work is required to find determinants of interfraction and intrafraction motion that may help guide the individualized application of planning target volume margins.