Fox squirrels match food assessment and cache effort to value and scarcity

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e92892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092892. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Scatter hoarders must allocate time to assess items for caching, and to carry and bury each cache. Such decisions should be driven by economic variables, such as the value of the individual food items, the scarcity of these items, competition for food items and risk of pilferage by conspecifics. The fox squirrel, an obligate scatter-hoarder, assesses cacheable food items using two overt movements, head flicks and paw manipulations. These behaviors allow an examination of squirrel decision processes when storing food for winter survival. We measured wild squirrels' time allocations and frequencies of assessment and investment behaviors during periods of food scarcity (summer) and abundance (fall), giving the squirrels a series of 15 items (alternating five hazelnuts and five peanuts). Assessment and investment per cache increased when resource value was higher (hazelnuts) or resources were scarcer (summer), but decreased as scarcity declined (end of sessions). This is the first study to show that assessment behaviors change in response to factors that indicate daily and seasonal resource abundance, and that these factors may interact in complex ways to affect food storing decisions. Food-storing tree squirrels may be a useful and important model species to understand the complex economic decisions made under natural conditions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Feeding Behavior*
  • Female
  • Food*
  • Male
  • Nuts
  • Sciuridae / physiology*
  • Seasons
  • Time Factors

Grants and funding

This work was funded by the University of California at Berkeley Chancellor's Fellowship and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to MD and the National Science Foundation Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems Grant 1028319 to LJ. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.