A systematic review of open reduction and internal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with or without allograft strut, cerclage, and locked plates

J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):872-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.010. Epub 2014 Mar 17.

Abstract

Few comparative studies exist for open reduction and internal fixation of Vancouver B1 and C fractures. We therefore performed a systematic review of fractures treated with or without an allograft strut, and using various fixation techniques. Thirty-seven manuscripts including 682 fractures were identified between 1992 and 2012. Percent union was similar for Vancouver B1 fractures treated with or without an allograft strut (90.7% vs. 91.5%). Time to union (4.4 vs. 6.6 months) and deep infection (3.8% vs. 8.3%) were increased with use of allograft struts. Percent union and time to union were unaffected by plate type or use of cerclage. We conclude that due to increased infection and time to union, allograft struts should be used cautiously during operative treatment of Vancouver B1 factures.

Keywords: allograft strut; open reduction and internal fixation; periprosthetic femur fracture; systematic review.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / adverse effects*
  • Bone Plates
  • Femoral Fractures / surgery
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / instrumentation*
  • Hip Prosthesis / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Periprosthetic Fractures / surgery*
  • Transplantation, Homologous
  • Treatment Outcome