Technical and biological complications related to crown to implant ratio: a systematic review

Implant Dent. 2014 Apr;23(2):180-7. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000026.

Abstract

Aim: To review the occurrence of prosthetic failure and biological complications with respect to the crown to implant (C/I) ratio.

Methods: Accurate search was made on the subject C/I ratio with the following criteria: (1) studies on humans with data on prosthetic failure and/or biological complications related to C/I ratio; (2) partial edentulous patients; (3) randomized clinical trials, prospective, longitudinal, retrospective, and multicenter studies with a minimum of 48 months mean follow-up; (4) language: English; (5) radiographic measurements by peri-apical x-ray; (6) implant material: titanium; and (7) no implant type selection was applied.

Results: Six articles were considered eligible for full-text analysis. Unfavorable C/I ratio can be considered a potential risk factor for single crown and abutment loosening (C/I ratio ≥ 1.46) and abutment fractures in posterior areas (C/I ratio ≥ 2.01).

Conclusions: Despite the limited data, high C/I ratio may be related to some prosthetic failures. Unfavorable C/I ratio does not affect biological complications and implant failure.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Crowns* / adverse effects
  • Dental Abutments / adverse effects
  • Dental Implants* / adverse effects
  • Dental Prosthesis Design
  • Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported / adverse effects
  • Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported / methods
  • Dental Restoration Failure / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans

Substances

  • Dental Implants