Tumor deposit is a poor prognostic indicator for patients who have stage II and III colorectal cancer with fewer than 4 lymph node metastases but not for those with 4 or more

Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Apr;57(4):467-74. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000059.

Abstract

Background: Extranodal tumor deposits are involved in TNM classification. However, it is uncertain whether a tumor deposit is a regular lymph node metastasis, and its prognostic significance in patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer remains to be established.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the prognostic significance of tumor deposits for stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Design: This study is a retrospective review of clinicopathological data.

Setting: This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital/referral center in Japan.

Patients: We reviewed the clinical course of 171 stage II and 173 stage III consecutive patients between January 1999 and December 2006.

Main outcome measures: We examined the clinicopathological features of colorectal cancers with tumor deposits and calculated overall survival and recurrence-free survival of the patients according to the status of tumor deposits. The primary outcome was the impact of tumor deposits on patient survival.

Results: Thirty-five (10.2%) patients with colorectal cancers had tumor deposits in the pericolic and/or mesocolic region. Survival rates among the patients with tumor deposits were significantly lower than those without (5-year overall survival: 58.4% vs 81.0%, p < 0.0001; 5-year recurrence-free survival: 47.1% vs 73.4%, p < 0.0001). Tumor deposit was an independent prognostic factor for patients with colorectal cancer in multivariate analysis (overall survival: HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.26-4.04; p = 0.04; recurrence-free survival: HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.04-4.90; p = 0.04). Tumor deposit was an independent prognostic factor in N0 and N1 colorectal cancer, whereas N2 cancer had poor survival outcome regardless of tumor deposit.

Limitations: Our study was a single-institution retrospective study, and the numbers of patients were relatively small to draw firm conclusions.

Conclusion: Tumor deposit may be an independent adverse prognostic factor for stage II and III N1 colorectal cancer.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Colectomy
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / mortality
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / surgery
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Intra-Abdominal Fat / pathology*
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Male
  • Mesentery
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Prognosis
  • Rectum / surgery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome