Risk factors for total hip arthroplasty aseptic revision

J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.023. Epub 2014 Jan 25.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient, operative, implant, surgeon, and hospital factors associated with aseptic revision after primary THA in patients registered in a large US Total Joint Replacement Registry. A total of 35,960 THAs registered from 4/2001-12/2010 were evaluated. The 8-year survival rate was 96.7% (95% CI 96.4%-97.0%). Females had a higher risk of aseptic revision than males. Hispanic and Asian patients had a lower risk of revision than white patients. Ceramic-on-ceramic, ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene, and metal-on-conventional polyethylene bearing surfaces had a higher risk of revision than metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene. Body mass index, health status, diabetes, diagnosis, fixation, approach, bilateral procedures, head size, surgeon fellowship training, surgeon and hospital volume were not revision risk factors.

Keywords: Total Joint Replacement Registry; aseptic revisions; risk factors; total hip arthroplasty.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / adverse effects
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods*
  • Body Mass Index
  • Ceramics
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Metals
  • Middle Aged
  • Polyethylene / chemistry
  • Prosthesis Design*
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Registries
  • Reoperation / methods*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States

Substances

  • Metals
  • Polyethylene