De novo assembly and transcriptome analysis of contrasting sugarcane varieties

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 11;9(2):e88462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088462. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Sugarcane is an important crop and a major source of sugar and alcohol. In this study, we performed de novo assembly and transcriptome annotation for six sugarcane genotypes involved in bi-parental crosses. The de novo assembly of the sugarcane transcriptome was performed using short reads generated using the Illumina RNA-Seq platform. We produced more than 400 million reads, which were assembled into 72,269 unigenes. Based on a similarity search, the unigenes showed significant similarity to more than 28,788 sorghum proteins, including a set of 5,272 unigenes that are not present in the public sugarcane EST databases; many of these unigenes are likely putative undescribed sugarcane genes. From this collection of unigenes, a large number of molecular markers were identified, including 5,106 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and 708,125 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). This new dataset will be a useful resource for future genetic and genomic studies in this species.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cluster Analysis
  • Databases, Genetic
  • Expressed Sequence Tags
  • Genes, Plant
  • Genetic Markers / genetics
  • Genotype
  • Microsatellite Repeats
  • Open Reading Frames
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
  • Saccharum / chemistry*
  • Saccharum / genetics*
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA
  • Sucrose / chemistry*
  • Transcriptome*

Substances

  • Genetic Markers
  • Sucrose

Grants and funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, http://www.fapesp.br) for the financial support grants 2008/52197-4 (AS) and 2008/58031-0 (RV) and for the graduate scholarships to CBCS, EAC, MCM, and TWB, and to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPQ, http://www.cnpq.br) for the research fellowships to AAG, APS, and RV. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.