Clinical and radiographic outcomes of acetabular impaction grafting without cage reinforcement for revision hip replacement: a minimum ten-year follow-up study

Bone Joint J. 2014 Feb;96-B(2):188-94. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.32121.

Abstract

Impaction bone grafting for the reconstitution of bone stock in revision hip surgery has been used for nearly 30 years. Between 1995 and 2001 we used this technique in acetabular reconstruction, in combination with a cemented component, in 304 hips in 292 patients revised for aseptic loosening. The only additional supports used were stainless steel meshes placed against the medial wall or laterally around the acetabular rim to contain the graft. All Paprosky grades of defect were included. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected in surviving patients at a minimum of ten years after the index operation. Mean follow-up was 12.4 years (sd 1.5) (10.0 to 16.0). Kaplan-Meier survival with revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 85.9% (95% CI 81.0 to 90.8) at 13.5 years. Clinical scores for pain relief remained satisfactory, and there was no difference in clinical scores between cups that appeared stable and those that appeared radiologically loose.

Keywords: Bone grafting; Joint revision; Arthroplasty; Replacement; Hip; Outcome.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Acetabulum / surgery*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods*
  • Bone Cements*
  • Bone Transplantation / methods*
  • Female
  • Femur Head / transplantation*
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Forecasting*
  • Hip Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Reoperation / methods
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Bone Cements