Comparison of firefighters and non-firefighters and the test methods used regarding the effects of personal protective equipment on individual mobility

Appl Ergon. 2014 Jul;45(4):1019-27. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

Abstract

The aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the current pilot test method and ascertain reliable measurements for a standard test method of mobility with personal protective equipment (PPE), such as physical performance and balance ability tests; 2) to compare two participant groups (firefighters versus non-firefighters) and to investigate whether non-firefighters are appropriate as a standard participant group in the field of PPE or not. Totally, 18 participants (nine professional firefighters and nine untrained males) performed the current pilot test method consisting of a balance test, completed prior to and after a performance test. Significant differences were found between PPE conditions and CON (the control clothing ensemble: T-shirt, shorts, and running shoes) for the functional balance test, physical performance test, heart rate, and subjective evaluations in firefighters group. Therefore, the present pilot test method is valid as a standard test method for assessing mobility while wearing PPE. Moreover, the present result shows that firefighters are more reliable than non-firefighters in testing of PPE with current test methods.

Keywords: Mobility; Personal protective equipment; Test methods.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Firefighters*
  • Hand Strength
  • Heart Rate
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Movement*
  • Physical Fitness
  • Postural Balance
  • Protective Clothing / adverse effects
  • Protective Clothing / standards*