Prognosis of adenosquamous carcinoma compared with adenocarcinoma in uterine cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Feb;24(2):289-94. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000063.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the survival outcomes of adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) of the cervix.

Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase for observational studies that compared the outcomes of 2 histologic subtypes. Hazards ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a fixed effects model.

Results: A total of 17 studies were included in the analyses. Patients with ASC were associated significantly with poorer overall survival (death HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.12-1.43; I(2) = 0%) and recurrence-free survival (recurrence HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.05-1.95; I(2) = 19.4%) than those with AC. For clinical stages I and II in particular, ASC predicted significantly poorer outcomes compared with AC (death HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.17-1.70; I(2) = 0%).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that ASC may have poorer outcomes compared with AC of the cervix.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / diagnosis
  • Adenocarcinoma / mortality*
  • Carcinoma, Adenosquamous / diagnosis
  • Carcinoma, Adenosquamous / mortality*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Observational Studies as Topic
  • Prognosis
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / mortality*