Long-term results of mucosal advancement flap combined with platelet-rich plasma for high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas

Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Feb;57(2):223-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000023.

Abstract

Background: The long-term closure rate of high perianal fistulas after surgical treatment remains disappointing.

Objective: The goal of this study was to improve the long-term closure rate of high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas combining mucosal advancement flap with platelet-rich plasma.

Design: This study was retrospective in design.

Setting: This study was conducted at 2 secondary and 1 tertiary referral hospitals.

Patients: Patients presenting with high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas involving the middle/upper third of the anal sphincter complex were included.

Interventions: A staged surgical treatment was performed; After seton placement, a mucosal advancement flap was combined with platelet-rich plasma.

Main outcome measures: Recurrence was the main outcome. Incontinence was the secondary outcome.

Results: We operated on 25 patients between 2006 and 2012. Thirteen (52%) patients had previous fistula surgery. The median follow-up period was 27 months. One patient (4.0%) was lost to follow-up after 4 months. Freedom from recurrence at 2 years was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.62-0.93). Two of the 4 patients with a recurrence (8%) had a repeated treatment and healed. One patient (4.0%) refused another treatment, but agreed to stay in follow-up. One patient (4.0%) requested a colostomy, resulting in closure of the fistula. Complications occurred in 1 patient (4.0%). Incontinence numbers were low with a median Vaizey score of 3.0 out of a maximum of 24.

Limitations: The study was limited by its retrospective design, lack of preoperative incontinence data, selection bias, and phone interview follow-up.

Conclusion: The long-term outcome results of patients with primary and recurrent high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas treated with a seton followed by mucosal advancement flap and platelet-rich plasma show low recurrence, complication, and incontinence rates. Therefore, this technique seems to be a valid option as treatment. Larger and preferably randomized controlled studies are needed to further explore this surgical technique.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01615302.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Fecal Incontinence / prevention & control
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pilot Projects
  • Platelet-Rich Plasma*
  • Rectal Fistula / pathology
  • Rectal Fistula / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Surgical Flaps*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wound Healing
  • Young Adult

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01615302