Tumor classification for early oral cancer: re-evaluate the current TNM classification

Head Neck. 2015 Feb;37(2):223-8. doi: 10.1002/hed.23581. Epub 2014 Mar 21.

Abstract

Background: We hypothesized that incorporation of tumor thickness into the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system will provide better prognostic information. Tumors were reclassified as T1 if ≤5-mm thick/≤4-cm diameter, and T2 if >5-mm thick/≤4-cm diameter.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 322 patients with T1 and T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) between 1987 and 2012. Univariable survival analysis was performed using the log-rank test and multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results: Multivariable analysis confirmed that tumor thickness is the most important predictor of disease-specific survival (DSS; hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; p = .03) and overall survival (OS; HR, 2.9; p = .001). Using the current TNM classification system, there is no significant difference in survival between the T1 and T2 groups for DSS (p = .13) or OS (p = .66). The revised staging system was superior at stratifying patients according to the T classification for both DSS (p = .016) and OS (p < .001).

Conclusion: Tumor thickness is an important prognostic indicator in early oral SCC and should be incorporated in the TNM classification system.

Keywords: depth of invasion; head and neck cancer; oral cavity/mouth neoplasm; staging; tumor thickness.

MeSH terms

  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / mortality
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / pathology*
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / therapy
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Mouth Neoplasms / mortality
  • Mouth Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Mouth Neoplasms / therapy
  • Neoplasm Invasiveness
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies