Benefits from new ADP antagonists as compared with clopidogrel in patients with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;63(4):339-50. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000052.

Abstract

Aims: New P2Y12 receptor inhibitors have provided new and more potent antiplatelet strategies, although raising several concerns on possible increase of bleedings. The aim of current meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonists as compared with clopidogrel in elective or ACS patients managed invasively.

Methods and results: Literature archives (Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane) and main scientific sessions abstracts were scanned for randomized trials comparing new ADP antagonists with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes or stable angina. Primary endpoint was mortality. Secondary endpoints were: (1) nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), (2) recurrent ischemia symptoms or ischemia-driven revascularization (RI/IDR), (3) stent thrombosis (ST), and (4) safety endpoints, defined as for TIMI major bleeding criteria. A total of 8 randomized clinical trials were finally included, for a total population of 67,851 patients. Mean follow-up was 7.6 months, ranging from 48 hours to 30 months. New ADP antagonists significantly reduced mortality {3.1% vs. 3.6%, odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)], 0.86 [0.79-0.94], P = 0.0008, P(het) = 0.18}, with greater impact of oral drugs. Similar benefits were found for MI [6.1% vs. 7%; OR (95% CI) (random-effect model) = 0.88 (0.79-0.98), P = 0.01, P(het) = 0.02], RI [2.7% vs. 3.1%; OR (95% CI) = 0.85 (0.77-0.93), P = 0.0005, P(het) = 0.09], or ST [1.1% vs. 1.7%; OR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.51-0.71), P < 0.00001, P(het) = 0.13]. By meta-regression analysis, no relationship was observed between benefits in mortality, new MI, RI, and ST with new ADP antagonists and patients' risk profile [beta (95% CI) = -0.01 [-0.30 to 0.27], P = 0.94; beta (95% CI) = -0.05 [-1.49 to 1.43], P = 0.96); beta (95% CI) = 0.19 (-0.18 to 0.57), P = 0.31, and beta (95% CI) = -0.08 (-0.86 to 0.70), P = 0.84, respectively].

Conclusions: Present meta-analysis shows that the new ADP antagonists prasugrel, ticagrelor, and cangrelor are associated to significant reduction of mortality, reinfarction, RI, and ST respect to clopidogrel alone, without significant increase in bleeding complications.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome / drug therapy*
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome / mortality
  • Adenosine Diphosphate*
  • Angina, Stable / drug therapy*
  • Angina, Stable / mortality
  • Case Management
  • Clopidogrel
  • Endpoint Determination
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists / adverse effects
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists / therapeutic use*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Ticlopidine / adverse effects
  • Ticlopidine / analogs & derivatives*
  • Ticlopidine / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
  • Adenosine Diphosphate
  • Clopidogrel
  • Ticlopidine