Effect of geolocators on migration and subsequent breeding performance of a long-distance passerine migrant

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 4;8(12):e82316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082316. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Geolocators are small light-weight data loggers used to track individual migratory routes, and their use has increased exponentially in birds. However, the effects of geolocators on individual performance are still poorly known. We studied geolocator effects on a long-distance migrating passerine bird, the northern wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe L.). We asked the general question of whether geolocators affect migratory behaviour and subsequent reproductive performance of small passerines by comparing arrival time, breeding time, breeding success and survival of geolocator versus control birds of known identity and breeding history. During two years geolocator birds (n=37) displayed a lower apparent survival (30%) as compared to controls (45%, n=164). Furthermore, returning geolocator birds (n=12) arrived on average 3.5 days later, started laying eggs 6.3 days later, and had lower nest success (25%) than control birds (78%). Our results suggest that geolocators affect migratory performance with carry-over effects to the timing of breeding and reproductive success in the subsequent breeding season. We discuss the implications of such geolocator effects for the study of migratory strategies of small passerines in general and suggest how to identify and investigate such effects in the future.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animal Migration / physiology*
  • Animals
  • Breeding*
  • Female
  • Geographic Information Systems*
  • Male
  • Oviposition / physiology
  • Passeriformes / physiology*
  • Reproduction / physiology
  • Survival Analysis
  • Sweden
  • Time Factors

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Swedish Research Council VR (http://www.vr.se/, 621-2011-5608 to TP, A0698901 to DA), FORMAS (http://www.formas.se/, 2008-547 to ML), and Helge Ax:son Johnson’s Foundation (http://www.haxsonj.se/, to DA) provided financial support. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.