A study of incentives to support and promote public health accreditation

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):98-103. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31829ed746.

Abstract

Context: Accreditation of public health agencies through the Public Health Accreditation Board is voluntary. Incentives that encourage agencies to apply for accreditation have been suggested as important factors in facilitating participation by state and local agencies.

Objective: The project describes both current and potential incentives that are available at the federal, state, and local levels.

Design: Thirty-nine key informants from local, state, tribal, federal, and academic settings were interviewed from March through May 2012. Through open-ended interviews, respondents were asked about incentives that were currently in use in their settings and incentives they thought would help encourage participation in Public Health Accreditation Board accreditation.

Results: Incentives currently in use by public health agencies based on interviews include (1) financial support, (2) legal mandates, (3) technical assistance, (4) peer support workgroups, and (5) state agencies serving as role models by seeking accreditation themselves. Key informants noted that state agencies are playing valuable and diverse roles in providing incentives for accreditation within their own states. Key informants also identified the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other players, such as private foundations, public health institutes, national and state associations, and academia as providing both technical and financial assistance to support accreditation efforts.

Conclusions: State, tribal, local, and federal agencies, as well as related organizations can play an important role by providing incentives to move agencies toward accreditation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Accreditation / economics
  • Accreditation / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Accreditation / organization & administration*
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.
  • Efficiency, Organizational
  • Government Agencies / economics
  • Government Agencies / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Government Agencies / organization & administration*
  • Humans
  • Motivation*
  • Public Health Administration / economics
  • Public Health Administration / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Public Health Administration / standards*
  • Quality Improvement / economics
  • Quality Improvement / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Quality Improvement / organization & administration*
  • United States