Infant robotic pyeloplasty: comparison with an open cohort

Abstract

Objective: To present our experience with infant pyeloplasty, comparing outcomes between robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and open pyeloplasty (OP).

Materials and methods: A retrospective review was performed of all children <1 year of age who underwent unilateral dismembered pyeloplasty at a single pediatric institution since January 2007. Patients with standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty were excluded. Patient demographics, intraoperative details, narcotic usage, and complications were reviewed.

Results: A total of 70 infants (51 boys and 19 girls) were identified, with nine RALP and 61 OP performed. Median age was 9.2 months (range, 3.7-11.9 months) for RALP and 4.1 months (range, 1.0-11.6 months) for OP (p = 0.005). Median weight was 8 kg (range, 5.8-10.9 kg) for RALP and 7 kg (range, 4-14 kg) for OP (p = 0.163). Median operative time was 115 min (range, 95-205 min) for RALP and 166 min (range, 79-300 min) for OP (p = 0.028). Median hospital stay was 1 day (range, 1-2 days) for RALP and 3 days (range, 1-7 days) for OP (p < 0.001). Median postoperative narcotic use of morphine equivalent was <0.01 mg/kg/day (range, 0-0.1 mg/kg/day) for RALP and 0.05 mg/kg/day (range, 0-2.2 mg/kg/day) for OP (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 7.2-17.8 months) for RALP and 43.6 months (3.4-73.8 months) for OP (p < 0.001). The success rate was 100% for RALP and 98% for OP.

Conclusions: Infant RALP was observed to be feasible and efficacious with shorter operative time, hospital stay, and narcotic utilization than OP.

Keywords: Infant; Pyeloplasty; Robotic; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction.