What is the role of the Ross procedure in today's armamentarium?

Can J Cardiol. 2013 Dec;29(12):1569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.08.009.

Abstract

The Ross procedure, which consists of replacing the aortic root with a pulmonary autograft, is the only surgery that ensures long-term viability of the aortic valve substitute. The presence of a living valve in the aortic position was theorized to translate into improved clinically relevant outcomes. This has now been confirmed by a number of recently published studies, which highlight the benefits associated with this surgery in terms of survival, quality of life, hemodynamic characteristics, and freedom from valve-related complications. Nevertheless, despite the evidence, the Ross procedure remains largely underused and has even been abandoned by a large number of groups based on some real and sometimes justifiable concerns, and a number of unfounded biases. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive, evidence-based review of the current literature pertaining to the Ross procedure, with an emphasis on the rationale, results, technical key points, alternatives, and future directions.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Allografts
  • Aortic Valve / surgery*
  • Autografts
  • Bioprosthesis / adverse effects
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Female
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects
  • Hemodynamics / physiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Postoperative Complications / mortality
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control
  • Pulmonary Valve / surgery
  • Pulmonary Valve / transplantation*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Risk Factors
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult