Bone regeneration in rat cranium critical-size defects induced by Cementum Protein 1 (CEMP1)

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e78807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078807. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Gene therapy approaches to bone and periodontal tissue engineering are being widely explored. While localized delivery of osteogenic factors like BMPs is attractive for promotion of bone regeneration; method of delivery, dosage and side effects could limit this approach. A novel protein, Cementum Protein 1 (CEMP1), has recently been shown to promote regeneration of periodontal tissues. In order to address the possibility that CEMP1 can be used to regenerate other types of bone, experiments were designed to test the effect of hrCEMP1 in the repair/regeneration of a rat calvaria critical-size defect. Histological and microcomputed tomography (µCT) analyses of the calvaria defect sites treated with CEMP1 showed that after 16 weeks, hrCEMP1 is able to induce 97% regeneration of the defect. Furthermore, the density and characteristics of the new mineralized tissues were normal for bone. This study demonstrates that hrCEMP1 stimulates bone formation and regeneration and has therapeutic potential for the treatment of bone defects and regeneration of mineralized tissues.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bone Matrix / metabolism
  • Bone Regeneration / drug effects*
  • Bone Regeneration / genetics
  • Calcium Phosphates / metabolism
  • Crystallization
  • Gelatin / metabolism
  • Gene Expression
  • Male
  • Microscopy, Atomic Force
  • Osteogenesis / drug effects
  • Osteogenesis / genetics
  • Proteins / pharmacology*
  • Rats
  • Recombinant Proteins / pharmacology
  • Skull / injuries
  • Skull / pathology
  • Skull / surgery
  • Tissue Scaffolds
  • Wound Healing

Substances

  • CEMP1 protein, human
  • Calcium Phosphates
  • Proteins
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • octacalcium phosphate
  • Gelatin

Grants and funding

This project was partially supported by DGAPA-UNAM IN216711, and CONACyT 130950. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.