Higher moral obligations of tolerance toward other minorities: an extra burden on stigmatized groups

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Mar;40(3):363-76. doi: 10.1177/0146167213512208. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

Abstract

In four experiments, we tested whether members of stigmatized groups are expected to be more tolerant toward other minorities than members of non-stigmatized groups and assessed the consequences of disconfirming those expectancies. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that majority group members expected members of a stigmatized group to be more tolerant toward immigrants, particularly when the stigmatized minority was perceived as having overcome the negative consequences of its victimization. When this tolerance expectation was disconfirmed, stigmatized group members were judged more immoral than members of a non-stigmatized group that held the same intolerant attitudes. Experiments 3 and 4 showed that these effects were driven by the belief that stigmatized groups should derive benefits from their suffering. These findings suggest that stigmatized groups are judged according to stricter moral standards than non-stigmatized groups because majority group members need to make meaning of the undeserved suffering experienced by victims of social stigma.

Keywords: intergroup relations; just world; moral obligations; social stigma; tolerance; victimhood.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Attitude*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Minority Groups / psychology*
  • Moral Obligations*
  • Social Stigma*