Introduction: This research aimed to investigate the preference of patients in Toronto, Canada for management of a tooth affected by painful apical periodontitis when considering its retention via root canal treatment (RCT) and its extraction followed by no replacement, replacement with an implant-supported crown, fixed, or removable partial prostheses.
Methods: Data were collected through a mail-out survey of the University of Toronto Faculty of Dentistry patients, which was complemented by a convenience sample of patients in 10 community practices in Toronto (n = 1000, response rate = 43%). Participants were asked to select their general preference for anterior and posterior teeth with apical periodontitis between saving the tooth or extraction and their specific preference for tooth retention via RCT or extraction. By using bivariate and logistic regression analyses, we applied the Gelberg-Andersen Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations to the preference questions to understand the influential factors (P ≤ .05).
Results: Participants' specific preference for tooth retention via RCT was slightly but significantly lower than their general preference (anterior tooth, 93.7% versus 97.2%; posterior tooth, 83.8% versus 89.6%; P < .005). Higher annual income, previous RCT, functional dentition, good/excellent self-rated oral health, and regular dental visits were associated with higher preferences for tooth retention in response to different questions.
Conclusions: The high preference for retaining a tooth in general was moderated by the specific consideration of RCT to retain the tooth. When RCT and extraction are viable options, patients should be advised about the treatment options in an impartial manner and encouraged to communicate their preferences.
Keywords: Apical periodontitis; decision making; patient preference.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.