Mobile health is worth it! Economic benefit and impact on health of a population-based mobile screening program in new Mexico

Telemed J E Health. 2014 Jan;20(1):18-23. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0080. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

Abstract

Background: HABITS for Life was a 3-year initiative to broadly deliver a statewide biometric and retinal screening program via a mobile unit throughout New Mexico at no charge to participants. The program goal-to identify health risk and improve population health status-was tested over a 3-year period. Value to participants and impact to the healthcare system were measured to quantify impact and value of investing in prevention at the community level.

Materials and methods: We used the Mobile Health Map Return-on-Investment Calculator, a mobile screening unit, biometric screening, retinography, and community coordination. Our systems included satellite, DSL, and 3G connectivity, a Tanita® (Arlington Heights, IL) automated body mass index-measuring scale, the Cholestec® (Alere™, Waltham, MA) system for biomarkers and glycosylated hemoglobin, a Canon (Melville, NY) CR-1 Mark II camera, and the Picture Archiving Communication System.

Results: In this report for the fiscal year 2011 time frame, 6,426 individuals received biometric screening, and 5,219 received retinal screening. A 15:1 return on investment was calculated; this excluded retinal screening for the under-65 year olds, estimated at $10 million in quality-adjusted life years saved. Statistically significant improvement in health status evidenced by sequential screening included a decrease in total cholesterol level (p=0.002) (n=308) and an increase in high-density lipoprotein level after the first and second screening (p=0.02 and p=0.01, respectively), but a decrease in mean random glucose level was not statistically significant (p=0.62). Retinal results indicate 28.4% (n=1,482) with a positive/abnormal finding, of which 1.79% (n=93) required immediate referral for sight-threatening retinopathy and 27% (n=1,389) required follow-up of from 3 months to 1 year.

Conclusions: Screening programs are cost-effective and provide value in preventive health efforts. Broad use of screening programs should be considered in healthcare redesign efforts. Community-based screening is an effective strategy to identify health risk, improve access, provide motivation to change health habits, and improve physical status while returning significant value.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Blood Glucose
  • Blood Pressure
  • Body Mass Index
  • Body Weights and Measures
  • Cholesterol / blood
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Diabetes Mellitus / diagnosis*
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological / economics*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Screening / economics*
  • Mass Screening / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Mobile Health Units / economics*
  • Mobile Health Units / organization & administration
  • Models, Economic
  • New Mexico
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Telemedicine / economics*
  • Telemedicine / methods

Substances

  • Blood Glucose
  • Cholesterol