Current pathology practices in and barriers to MDS diagnosis

Leuk Res. 2013 Dec;37(12):1656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell malignancies that represent a diagnostic challenge for pathologists. Accurate classification and prognostic scoring are essential to treating MDS. To understand factors that affect MDS management, a case-based survey was distributed to hematopathologists (n=53) and general pathologists (n=72) to identify perceived barriers, attitudes, and practices in MDS diagnosis. Results demonstrated confidence and practice gaps. Only 33% of general pathologists are confident in diagnosing MDS. Neither general pathologists nor hematopathologists are comfortable using the International Prognostic Scoring System to characterize risk. Thirty percent of general pathologists and 22% of hematopathologists would not include bone marrow aspirate and cytogenetics in initial testing of a neutropenic patient. Most practitioners tested appropriately for disease classification and prognosis; discrepancies were identified in testing to differentiate MDS from acute myeloid leukemia and testing in post treatment specimens. These results have implications in the management of MDS.

Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; Hematopathology; Myelodysplastic syndromes; Pathology; Physician practice patterns; Practice gaps.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Clinical Competence / statistics & numerical data
  • Data Collection
  • Guideline Adherence / statistics & numerical data
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes / classification*
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes / pathology*
  • Pathology, Clinical*
  • Perception
  • Professional Practice / standards*
  • Prognosis
  • Review Literature as Topic
  • Workforce