[Latin American medical students' appraisal on university scientific research training]

Rev Med Chil. 2013 Jun;141(6):716-22. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872013000600005.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Background: Learning research skills should be a goal during undergraduate training of physicians.

Aim: To identify Latin American medical students' appraisal on research skills university training.

Material and methods: A self-administered survey about experience in research, self-assessment of research skills, quality of training in the area received at the university and that importance of publishing as undergraduate students, was answered by 208 medical students aged 23 ± 3 years (54% male), attending a medical students congress.

Results: Seventy percent of respondents pertained to medical students' scientific societies and 34% had published in a scientific journal. Fifty two percent considered as good or very good the training level received at their universities on information retrieval and 45% considered good the training in research methodology. Thirty two percent considered as poor or none the training received in scientific writing and 37% in the publishing process. Eighty nine percent considered student publishing as important and 61% perceived limitations in this matter.

Conclusions: The university training level received by Latin American medical students on research and publication process was evaluated as deficient by these students.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biomedical Research / education*
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Education, Medical, Undergraduate / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Latin America
  • Male
  • Periodicals as Topic / statistics & numerical data
  • Program Evaluation
  • Self-Assessment
  • Students, Medical / statistics & numerical data*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult