Background: Surgeons frequently discourage patients with ulcerative colitis from having surgery in the midst of an acute flare for fear of complications and poor long-term outcomes.
Methods: Outcomes of patients undergoing urgent versus elective surgery for ulcerative colitis were compared via retrospective review.
Results: Patients undergoing urgent (n = 80) versus elective (n = 99) surgery were younger, were more malnourished, had more severe active disease, and had higher steroid use (P ≤ .05). During surgery, hemodynamic stability was similar, but urgent patients underwent more subtotal colectomies (5.1% vs 29%, P < .0001) and fewer laparoscopic procedures (8.8% vs 18%, P = .07). Multivariate regression suggested that short-term complications were increased with higher body mass index and urgency status (P ≤ .05). Anastomotic leaks and long-term complications were similar between groups. Surgeon inexperience and use of immunomodulators other than infliximab were associated with increased odds of long-term fistula/abscess (odds ratio, 5.56; P = .05] and pouch failure (odds ratio, 13.3; P = .01).
Conclusions: Surgery in patients with acute ulcerative colitis flares is associated with more short-term complications than elective procedures but does not appear to affect risk for anastomotic leak or long-term complications when performed by an expert.
Keywords: Complications of IBD; Surgery for IBD; Ulcerative colitis.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.