Trophic hierarchies illuminated via amino acid isotopic analysis

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 25;8(9):e76152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076152. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Food web ecologists have long sought to characterize the trophic niches of animals using stable isotopic analysis. However, distilling trophic position from isotopic composition has been difficult, largely because of the variability associated with trophic discrimination factors (inter-trophic isotopic fractionation and routing). We circumvented much of this variability using compound-specific isotopic analysis (CSIA). We examined the (15)N signatures of amino acids extracted from organisms reared in pure culture at four discrete trophic levels, across two model communities. We calculated the degree of enrichment at each trophic level and found there was a consistent trophic discrimination factor (~7.6‰). The constancy of the CSIA-derived discrimination factor permitted unprecedented accuracy in the measurement of animal trophic position. Conversely, trophic position estimates generated via bulk-(15)N analysis significantly underestimated trophic position, particularly among higher-order consumers. We then examined the trophic hierarchy of a free-roaming arthropod community, revealing the highest trophic position (5.07) and longest food chain ever reported using CSIA. High accuracy in trophic position estimation brings trophic function into sharper focus, providing greater resolution to the analysis of food webs.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Amino Acids / chemistry*
  • Amino Acids / isolation & purification
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Animals
  • Arthropods / chemistry*
  • Avena / chemistry
  • Food Chain*
  • Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
  • Larva / chemistry
  • Nitrogen Isotopes / analysis*
  • Phaseolus / chemistry
  • Species Specificity
  • Vaccinium macrocarpon / chemistry

Substances

  • Amino Acids
  • Nitrogen Isotopes

Grants and funding

Funding was provided by USDA-ARS appropriated funds (3655-21220-001-00D), as well as grant funds (5352-22430-001-13). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.